Legacy LD5 http://legacy.lavadomefive.com:88/forum/ |
|
Treeble Art http://legacy.lavadomefive.com:88/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1062 |
Page 2 of 2 |
Author: | drages [ Mon May 30, 2011 9:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treeble Art |
Dinosorceror Can you please erase frchatty useless topics and arts from forums? They are realy not fitting here. |
Author: | Seika [ Tue May 31, 2011 3:48 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treeble Art |
AlternateArtisan wrote: yaknow what, this is exactly the kind of crap that goes on all the time in macrophile.com Which interestingly he's on too. but then again the fact that someone like him exists kinda makes you feel good about yourself secretly. As much as your art maybe mediocre at least you dont plagerise. He actually got banned from macrophile oddly enough. |
Author: | Dinosorceror [ Tue May 31, 2011 7:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treeble Art |
Yeah, I suppose I should remove some of the more retarded posts. I do have to use the "eviscerate from the time-space continuum" option as history is history, even if it's retard shit. Hey, maybe that'll be a quote I'm known for. |
Author: | Dragonstomp [ Tue May 31, 2011 1:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treeble Art |
Speaking of macrophile.com How bad is it overthere considering all i've been seeing there from lurking is a lot of stupidity especially from a certain user which i've know quite well. |
Author: | Dinosorceror [ Tue May 31, 2011 8:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treeble Art |
Man, I haven't even been shown links to that site in years. The FA arr-teest love-fest has kind of made art-lover-forums kinda obsolete. Thank the Great Egg that LD5 has so much more to offer! |
Author: | Tombfyre [ Tue May 31, 2011 9:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treeble Art |
FA loves more than artists! They like writers too, by the looks of things. That or people just like all the various forms of smut I produce. :3 |
Author: | Dinosorceror [ Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treeble Art |
What furries spooge to (in order of importance): 1 - 2-D art 2 - RP logs 3 - 3-D art 4 - Stories 5 - Screen captures At least you beat screen captures! |
Author: | AlternateArtisan [ Thu Jun 02, 2011 3:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treeble Art |
Dinosorceror wrote: What furries spooge to (in order of importance): 1 - 2-D art 2 - RP logs 3 - 3-D art 4 - Stories 5 - Screen captures At least you beat screen captures! I don't know, RP logs and Stories are hard to compare, I guess when you polish up an RP and make sure there aren't spelling and grammer errors, it can get quite exciting to read- then again, it's difficult to compare with a purpose written story which cuts out all together, any misunderstandings and 'passive posts' Blah. As for 3D art- there just aren't enough Good 3D artists in the fandom. 75% of the stuff is poser crap without even an attempt to photoshop out the ugliness and creases in the mesh.- |
Author: | Selendro [ Thu Jun 02, 2011 5:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treeble Art |
I think more than even technical stuff, Poser work often lacks in dynamics and composition. Boring camera angles, routine lighting, tired poses. It's almost closer to a kind of photography, but I suppose most people that are seriously trying just do their own thing. |
Author: | AlternateArtisan [ Thu Jun 02, 2011 5:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treeble Art |
The problem with poser is that you're by large, using pre-made models that are either stock, or slightly altered with no real originality, as well, Poser isn't a proper 3D software package, it cannot model or rig at all, and it has very rudimentry animation and rendering tools. |
Author: | Selendro [ Thu Jun 02, 2011 7:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treeble Art |
AlternateArtisan wrote: The problem with poser is that you're by large, using pre-made models that are either stock, or slightly altered with no real originality, as well, Poser isn't a proper 3D software package, it cannot model or rig at all, and it has very rudimentry animation and rendering tools. It exists to make bad porn. I know, I've used it for that. |
Author: | Leindurstit [ Thu Jun 02, 2011 5:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treeble Art |
Selendro wrote: It exists to make bad porn. I know, I've used it for that. Don't forget using the same Dragon model for hundreds of forums avatars over the internets. |
Author: | Dragonstomp [ Fri Jun 03, 2011 10:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treeble Art |
Sadly this is very true. And oh god the drama over critiques. It's pretty bad over on deviantart. Bad Anatomy = Style |
Author: | Patch [ Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Treeble Art |
Dinosorceror wrote: That's not even the point of what he's doing. It's almost as if it's his fetish, or at least his mania. It's like how a pyromaniac will set fires. It doesn't have to make sense, he just needs to do it. And...geez, this guy is on other forums and people are trying to, like, reason with him or something? People are weird. I was just dangling it along for fun. Dino, I think we've finally spawned our own sub-paraphilia! It's called annoying-macrophiliophilia. It's similar to gay-bashing, but subtly different. I compare and contrast them below. Here's how it works:
Maybe, as opposed to other fetishes, where inputs become progressively more refined/interesting/extreme, these folks get off by being less-and-less effective. A problem that almost solves itself. I remember someone saying the phrase "dusting off the old banhammer" but unless someone had applied dust to it since hemsterstemperedmundkemper, I don't see how it fell into apparent disuse so. |
Page 2 of 2 | All times are UTC - 9 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |